Scientists have warned that unless serious international efforts are taken to control the spread of Ebola virus, it could kill tens of thousands by the middle of December, which is alarming indeed.
In a report published today, scientists warn the window of opportunity to control the outbreak is ‘rapidly closing’. As a result, there could be ‘calamitous repercussions’, unless international efforts to control the disease are substantially increased.
Liberia is the worst hit country where poverty, corruption and civil war have left a weak health system unable to cope with the exponential spread of the disease.
Some religious leaders have their own interpretation of the causes of Ebola. Earlier this year, the Liberian Council of Churches said in a statement that God was angry with Liberians “over corruption and immoral acts” such as homosexuality, and that Ebola was a punishment.
In May, Archbishop Lewis Zeigler of the Catholic Church of Liberia said that “one of the major transgressions against God for which He may be punishing Liberia is the act of homosexuality,” local media reported.
A team of U.S. researchers used mathematical modelling to predict infection rates in Liberia’s most populated county, Montserrado.
They calculated that without extra help, as many as 171,000 people could succumb to Ebola by December 15, representing 12 per cent of an overall population of some 1.38 million.
In Montserrado alone, there could be more than 90,000 deaths by that time, many of them unreported. A single infected individual could pass on the infection to an average of 2.49 people in Montserrado, the researchers calculated.
Lead researcher Professor Alison Galvani, from the School of Public Health at Yale University, said: ‘Our predictions highlight the rapidly closing window of opportunity for controlling the outbreak and averting a catastrophic toll of new Ebola cases and deaths in the coming months.
‘Although we might still be within the midst of what will ultimately be viewed as the early phase of the current outbreak, the possibility of averting calamitous repercussions from an initially delayed and insufficient response is quickly eroding.’
The news comes as the World Health Organization’s emergency committee decided screening passengers for Ebola may have a ‘limited effect’ in stopping the spread of the virus.
Grave diggers creating graves to bury Ebola victims on the outskirts of Monrovia, Liberian capital
The committee warned that ‘resource demands may be significant’ when screening incoming passengers, but that it is up to individual Governments to decide whether the measure is necessary. Passengers are already screened as they leave Liberia, Sierra Leone and Guinea.
Writing in the journal The Lancet Infectious Diseases, the researchers today warned some 97,940 cases of the disease could be averted if the international community stepped up control measures immediately, starting from October 31, according to their model.
This would require more Ebola treatment beds, a five-fold increase in the speed at which new cases are detected, and the allocation of protective kits to households of patients awaiting admission to clinics.
At best, just over 53,957 cases could be prevented if interventions are delayed until November 15, said the researchers. Around 9,000 Ebola cases and 4,500 deaths have been reported in Liberia, Sierra Leone and Guinea since the outbreak began in December last year.
Health workers in the US, Spain and UK have been infected after being exposed to the virus in Africa. There are fears of the disease spreading from Africa to other parts of the world despite restrictions at air and sea ports.
Of the five African countries originally affected by the outbreak, Nigeria and Senegal have now been declared Ebola-free. Co-author Professor Frederick Altice, also from Yale University, said: ‘The current global health strategy is woefully inadequate to stop the current volatile Ebola epidemic.
‘At a minimum, capable logisticians are needed to construct a sufficient number of Ebola treatment units in order to avoid the unnecessary deaths of tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of people.’