The world community must come out of its self denial mode and stare at the problem of Global Warming in the right earnest. The reports which have been put forth by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, OECD, IMF, World Bank, and the International Renewable Energy Agency are credible enough to be accepted by the world community. The reports starkly lay bare the crisis which is staring at the world community whose very existence is being threatened.

The reports also confirm the worst fears that the situation is much more critical than projected. The reports will also lay the foundation of action rather than making the world aware of the dangers of global warming. It is time for action which will bring tangible improvements in the Global climate.

The unambiguous conclusion that humans are answerable

The report which has contributions from 259 authors, cited more than 9,200 sources, and called on 1,089 reviewers and after much deliberation and assessment, the  first installment was released in September. “Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. The report is a broad and solid appraisal of climate change to date and also gives the conclusion that human activity caused severe, irreversible and overwhelming impact on the environment.

The conclusion will also form the basis for countries which are most affected by the climate change to seek compensation for the damage and the losses which has been incurred due to Global Warming. It is not an optimistic report but a damningly accurate and true account of the havoc caused by human activities on the planets delicate ecosystem.

Making the world aware of the cost of carbon

One key area which policy planners have not focused was the subsidies which have been offered for the fossil fuels. In a report by OECD which was released in January, it was revealed that more than 34 member states used more than 550 mechanisms to subsidize fossil fuels.IMF used the same scale to draw upon the subsidies given for fossil fuel in 176 countries and it came out to be a whopping 480bn US dollars annually. Adjusting the account for the costly outcomes of consuming subsidized carbon countries were actually incurring an expense of 1.9 trillion dollars annually

Having revealed the true cost of the carbon the International Renewable Energy Association (IRENA) also dealt a death blow to the belief that renewable energy as impractical and unaffordable. The report clarifies that the cost of the renewable energy source varied by location and there is one source of renewable energy source that beats the cost of fossil fuels in every region

In totality, 2013 saw increased accountability in the discussion on climate change.

About The Author

A tech enthusiast, a traveler and a person who fights for the animal rights. He is well known for his love for the society and is the founder of the TheWestSideStory. His love for sharing information and journalism bought him to found thewestsidestory.net online news media website. A Proud American and a Proud Dad!

Related Posts

62 Responses

  1. gotime

    You killed the credibility of your article right at the beginning. You said the reports about global warming are coming from credible sources like the IMF & World Bank. Are you joking? Wake up shtoopy, those are the last entities with any credibility.

    Reply
    • klem

      Atta boy Phil, let it all out. Express your inner dictator.

      And when you’re done, you can move to North Korea, you’d fit right in.

      cheers

      Reply
      • Phil

        It’s like north Korea to keep with out-dated technology. We’re not all simple hillbillies in America as much as you and your ilk want. But like all addicts putting themselves and others at risk the lies and deception run strong, such as it is with fossil fuel burners. Who denies putting more carbon into the air changes it? Even a 3 year old North Korean knows that.

  2. Mattwal66

    In the 70s the Eco-Nazis were predicting that there was gonna be an ice-age. Then in the 80s they changed their tune, saying the Earth was warming! Wtf. Which is it? There is no scientific consensus. Ask any scientist not connected to the Eco-nazis and they will also say it’s BS! Global warming has been refuted. But I give you guys credit for desperately trying to keep one of the biggest lies ever alive. It’s just politics and has nothing to do with real science!

    Reply
    • klem

      Hey, I was one of those eco-nazis in the 70’s.

      But back then, we fought for clean air, land and water. Today’s eco-nazis aren’t interested in those goals anymore, they are too old school. Modern fashionable eco-nazis want carbon rationing, behavior modification and world government. An entirely different level of eco-nazism, believe me.

      Reply
    • The Truth Hurts

      Uh no, they weren’t. At least not the consensus. This is another BS statement that keeps getting repeated, but it’s not true. Sure there were predictions saying this or that, but they were never the consensus. Just hypotheses that never panned out. There’s people who still believe the earth is flat, you might be one of them, but no the earth isn’t flat either. Sorry to burst your bubble.

      Reply
  3. Mattwal66

    lol, what a load of hogwash! How come we never hear from the scientists who dispute such bold faced lies? I know there’s a ton of money to be made from this colossal lie. But the people are waking up and realizing there’re being duped.

    Reply
    • renewableguy

      Ignorance does not change the reality of a human induced warming climate. Less co2 gives our future generations a better place to live than if we pollute with co2 all we want. The external consequences need to be priced.

      Reply
    • The Truth Hurts

      “How come we never hear from the scientists who dispute such bold faced lies?”

      Because there are none. 97% of scientists agree with the IPCC report. But that doesn’t mean 3% disagree. Those 3% think the consequences are going to be far worse.

      Reply
      • James Vanderbilt

        The mythical 97% consensus that the global warming (or the more flexibly coined term of climate change) loons love to blabber about is just a desperate attempt to silence skeptics and shut down debate. To say that 97% agree on something as complicated climate change and it’s causes is just ludicrous. Critical thinking. Not everyone drinks the cool-aid.

  4. gecko39

    So come on denier bunches of guys; sing to me of Red Neck Love and whisper in my ear those famous Darwin Awards’ Red Neck Last Words: “Watch this!”

    Reply
  5. gecko39

    . . . on a planet where road accidents brutally kill more people daily than 9/11.

    Reply
  6. gecko39

    As if we’re a nation of one quarter billion one ton wheel chair walkers ever ready to sing “Springtime with Hitler in Germany” as in a Mel Brooks “Producers” movie or Broadway farce.

    Reply
  7. gecko39

    It would be laughable if the accelerating crisis was not so dire as climate deniers deny our mortality all the while clinging to strange beliefs as if it makes sense to continue paving over the natural paradise of our beautiful planetary home transforming it to a parking lot.

    To require a ton or more of manufactured garbage to move each individual person around this planet is a level of absurdity beyond belief.

    Reply
  8. thomaslaprade

    Recent research by Henrik Svensmark and his group at the Danish National
    Space Center points to the real cause of the recent warming trend. In a
    series of experiments on the formation of clouds, these scientists have
    shown that fluctuations in the Sun’s output cause the observed changes in the
    Earth’s temperature.

    In the past, scientists believed the fluctuations in the Sun’s output were
    too small to cause the observed amount of temperature change, hence the need
    to look for other causes like carbon dioxide. However, these new
    experiments show that fluctuations in the Sun’s output are in fact large
    enough, so there is no longer a need to resort to carbon dioxide as the
    cause of the recent warming trend.

    The discovery of the real cause of the recent increase in the Earth’s
    temperature is indeed a convenient truth. It means humans are not to blame
    for the increase. It also means there is absolutely nothing we can, much
    less do, to correct the situation.

    Thomas Laprade

    Reply
  9. Joe

    Ocean pH (is a forgotten issue)

    CO2 interacting with the Ocean is
    producing higher acidity in water.
    The rapid rate of change will not let
    the multitude of micro-ecosystems
    interlinked multi-dimentioally enough
    time to re-adjust, and find the new
    balance within a smooth transition.

    Precipitated change will cause some
    parts of the whole to crash, a few may
    be nurseries for species of fish we prefer,
    or others may promote predators …

    A triple Solution: Biochar
    1. Agricultural (more Soil for Food)
    2. Untapped bio-Fuels = *new* GDP from waste
    3. CO2 reduction (if you believe in effect)
    (if you don’t, then it should matter)

    Biochar can bury fossil fuels carbon
    faster than it can be extracted, allowing
    both to co-exist even without subsidy.

    Note: Biochar can be produced just about
    anywhere on the planet, providing a excellent
    amendment to Soil, co-generating bio-fuels,
    Charring can be high and low tech, tiny to
    very large scale, even provide input material
    to “regular” refineries that produce plastics,
    synthetics, inks, pharma, …

    keywords:
    biochar (soil 2.0), carbon negative economy,
    ocean acidity, more food for billions

    Reply
  10. gecko39

    There are 1000 billions in a trillion and the profit margins are astronomical even for the fossil fuel industry having just spent one billion dollars on climate change denial.

    The fossil fuel gets free money on the order of a half trillion dollars each year in the form of subsidies.

    It makes about five trillion dollars in annual income; and it has about ten to fifteen trillion dollars invested in infrastructure it is not anxious to write off anytime soon; despite it increasingly becoming obvious that the time is rapidly approaching when extreme weather events become so powerful, frequent, and dangerous that eighty percent of all fossil fuels will have to be left in the ground as humanity must fight for its survival at wartime speed with everything it has against acclerating climate change all consuming.

    Reply
  11. renewable guy

    Randall December 25, 2013 at 5:44 PM – Reply

    The anthropomorphic Global Warming ruse is nothing but a front for thuggish attempts to control political power and capitol. Will someone in the GW/CC camp please tell me in what year the most optimum climate for the earth took place. They don’t have an answer because they are too busy shouting down and bullying anyone who doesn’t agree with their opinion. Of course we have climate change. The climate has been changing since the day it was formed!
    ######################

    The last 10,000 years are represented pretty close to where we have been in blue. In red this is where we are going if we don’t stop emitting co2. I know where its bad for my grandchildren.

    http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Carbon-T-F.jpg

    Reply
  12. renewable guy

    Dave December 25, 2013 at 5:52 PM – Reply

    The climate will change and man has nothing to do with it.

    The left thinks man is god/supreme being and therefore man is responsible and man can change nature.
    ########################

    Man changed the atmosphere co2 content by 40% increase. What are the consequences of doing so?

    Reply
  13. renewable guy

    Zalman December 25, 2013 at 5:15 PM – Reply

    All this climate change “science” reached by apparent consensus among “scientists” smells. There seems to be a “climate change” industry developing, with the aim of compelling everyone to accept facts not necessarily in evidence. If the temperature of the atmosphere has been changing so dramatically, how come it has managed to stay the same for at least a decade?
    #######################

    There is statistically significant warming in less than 30 years. There is a significant pos trend in warming.
    http://www.skepticalscience.com/trend.php
    1996 to 2013
    HADCRUT4 hybrid
    Trend: 0.148 ±0.139 °C/decade (2σ)

    Reply
  14. renewable guy

    Robert December 25, 2013 at 7:34 PM – Reply

    What I would like to know are the qualifications of the author. PHD in physical chemistry or geophysics? Nah, probably masters in sociology or some other psuedoscience (i.e. underwater basket weaving?).
    #######################

    I am not a scientist, but from your post, I doubt very much that you are. The 5 IPCC’s all say to get off of co2 and advise how to do it. If you are a scientist I doubt you are any where near the caliber that they are in the IPCC. CO2 sends part of the infrared spectrum back to the surface of the earth. The more co2 in the atmosphere the more we send back to the earth. Not very hard to understand.

    Reply
  15. renewable guy

    Havasu December 25, 2013 at 8:56 PM – Reply

    If CO2 emissions go to zero, we will really see Global warming. Recent date suggest the largest contributor to CO2 emissions is cud chewing animals! Climate is best described as chaotic fluid dynamics. We have a difficult time predicting local weather beyond a day or two – Much less global climate change over years. Anyone remember the ice age we were promised back in the late 60′s? Follow the money because if you follow the science there is no current global warming.
    ###############

    Nice opinion. Any sources?
    If a model can hindcast reasonably well, then it can run a projection accurately. Take the human co2 out of the equation and the model no longer is accurate in hindcasting.

    http://www.skepticalscience.com/climate-models-intermediate.htm

    All the models are unable to predict recent warming without taking rising CO2 levels into account

    Reply
  16. M

    All of creation is groaning; the wages of sin is death; this Earth is passing away; be good stewards of the Earth but realize she will be made new when Christ comes back at the end of the 7 Year Tribulation.

    There is hope; there is a better life, a better world coming; believe in Jesus; He’s going to right every wrong & restore this Earth to what she once was.

    Maranatha!

    Reply
  17. renewable guy

    Havasu December 25, 2013 at 9:02 PM – Reply

    Primary reason for shrinking glaciers tends to be sublimation and not global warming. And not all areas are losing glacial mass: Mt Shasta in CA for instance. Has more to do with humidity/moisture, or the lack of it than heat
    #################

    If the earth is warming from human emissions, wouldn’t it stand that the ice would melt also?

    http://www.rgs.org/OurWork/Schools/Teaching+resources/Key+Stage+3+resources/Glacial+environments/Why+are+our+glaciers+shrinking.htm

    Reply
  18. hymie porkenstein

    only stupid people and democrats, why are synonomous for new taxes, believ this busll shit from the liberal scientist, when 99% of the other scientist call this.. bull shit polictics by niggrez like obamza

    Reply
  19. renewable guy

    Dave December 25, 2013 at 5:55 PM – Reply

    renewable guy December 25, 2013 at 5:11 PM – Reply

    John December 25, 2013 at 4:59 PM – Reply

    I’m already wide awake and I say global warming is bulls#it. Its a socialist scheme to transfer wealth. Nothing more.
    ##############

    Is that from Rush Limbaugh or Glenn Beck?

    No, that would be Algore. “Global Warming” has made him a wealthy man
    ###################

    http://money.msn.com/now/post.aspx?post=06167a85-b554-4bda-b5aa-2c4ec72ac090

    You must of got that from Limbaugh and Beck. Most of Gore’s money came from somewhere else. Should you get up the ambition, check out the article.

    Reply
  20. Havasu

    Primary reason for shrinking glaciers tends to be sublimation and not global warming. And not all areas are losing glacial mass: Mt Shasta in CA for instance. Has more to do with humidity/moisture, or the lack of it than heat.

    Reply
  21. Havasu

    If CO2 emissions go to zero, we will really see Global warming. Recent date suggest the largest contributor to CO2 emissions is cud chewing animals! Climate is best described as chaotic fluid dynamics. We have a difficult time predicting local weather beyond a day or two – Much less global climate change over years. Anyone remember the ice age we were promised back in the late 60’s? Follow the money because if you follow the science there is no current global warming.

    Reply
  22. Me

    Al Gore Forecasted “Ice-Free” Arctic by 2013; Ice Cover Expands 50%

    Reply
  23. Barack Odumbo

    There is a bigger crisis then global warming on this planet, it is the epidemic of global retardation. Scientists believe that all liberals are already infected, are too far gone to be saved, and should immediately stop breathing by any means possible.

    Reply
  24. Robert

    What I would like to know are the qualifications of the author. PHD in physical chemistry or geophysics? Nah, probably masters in sociology or some other psuedoscience (i.e. underwater basket weaving?).

    the world is always changing. always has. we know the oceans are warming. how many of you have been around for say the last 5 ice ages to observe all of the changes? that’s right, none of you. and we had these events when humans were not even a factor.

    as a scientist i have a really hard time with people who have such strong opinions with little or no scientific knowledge from which to develop said strong opinions.

    The joining of the radical greens and the Socialists (you call them progressives, but we all know they just tried to manipulate the language of discourse by not calling themselves who they really are) to enforce their agenda in all public schools and universities has helped lead to this Orwellian moment.

    I am a scientist and if i saw anything that was truly (sp) scary, i would join in with the save the eath movement. But i don’t, so i won’t.

    After how many years of dire predictions and now atmospheric temperatures are going down. the only thing we get back is,”i guess we need to tweak our models.” Tweak your models! we can’t even put together a complex enough model to predict the weather for more than 1 day out on the Front Range of Colorado because of the Rocky Mountains ( and yes that’s using a damn supercomputer!). if we can’t predict the weather in denver farther than 24 hours out, how the hell can you believe that we can predict man induced climate change 50 or 100 years out? allof these people who think they can predict the future are so full of it!

    my suggestion, get a real science degree at a top school that’s not brainwashing their students with the answers before the questions are asked (are there amy of these left?), then study BOTH sides of an issue, then develop an opinion. until then, you’re just performing the useful idiot role the Radical Greens and Sociialists need you to unquestioningly perform. Grow up!

    Reply
  25. Al Carty

    1 degree warming in 100 years. When will you robots stop drooling over Al Gore and whoever wrote his report for him? A Nobel Prize for him and Obama? It’s not global warming, it’s brain freezing. Get off your knees and start paying attention.

    Reply
  26. Jack

    Seriously how much longer do we have to listen this stuff … It’s really gone from rediclulose to bizzar … If they actually cared at all about the enviroent they would focus in something like air pollution in China — that is a real and ongoing thing …

    Warm is good – cold is bad / it’s the sun stupid and you can’t do anything but prepare either way..

    Jack

    Reply
  27. Samir

    The science is settled, here, and the debate is over. The earth hasn’t warmed in 17 years. These anti-science people who told us we’d have no ice at the North Pole by 2013, and that children in Britain would never know snow, cannot now turn around and say snow all over the UK and as far south as freaking EGYPT — plus record ice at the pole — is proof of their global warming theory. That’s not science as we know it in the Arab world. That’s a cult. Even Al Gore admitted the theory is nothing, by selling his TV channel to an oil nation. Please, let’s focus on real environmental threats and not imaginary ones that have been dis-proven.

    Reply
  28. Gary

    Climate change is a bunch of hype generated to get money. If you want to know what is really behind the so-called “climate change science”, just follow the money trail.

    Reply
  29. Dave

    renewable guy December 25, 2013 at 5:11 PM – Reply

    John December 25, 2013 at 4:59 PM – Reply

    I’m already wide awake and I say global warming is bulls#it. Its a socialist scheme to transfer wealth. Nothing more.
    ##############

    Is that from Rush Limbaugh or Glenn Beck?

    No, that would be Algore. “Global Warming” has made him a wealthy man

    Reply
  30. Frederick Hiller

    A few conservative commenters have cited the fact that atmospheric air temperatures have not risen in the last decade. The problem is that they are then using that fact as support for their misinformed judgment that the global temperature is not rising — this is incorrect. What they’re not understanding is that the atmosphere is only as thick as would be a sheet of newsprint wrapped on a basketball and that it can get only so hot–can hold only so much heat– before all that heat transfers into the oceans. The facts support this as the world’s ocean temperatures are now what is rising at rate never seen before. This will lead to super-storms, such as the Typhoon Hayian in the philippines — the largest Typhoon ever recorded–and inundation of coastal areas in the coming decades. The fools who still deny climate change will eat their ignorance in short order.

    Reply
  31. Dave

    The climate will change and man has nothing to do with it.

    The left thinks man is god/supreme being and therefore man is responsible and man can change nature.

    Reply
  32. Randall

    The anthropomorphic Global Warming ruse is nothing but a front for thuggish attempts to control political power and capitol. Will someone in the GW/CC camp please tell me in what year the most optimum climate for the earth took place. They don’t have an answer because they are too busy shouting down and bullying anyone who doesn’t agree with their opinion. Of course we have climate change. The climate has been changing since the day it was formed!

    Reply
  33. T69807

    The environmental movement has become the new home for disappointed totalitarians who were left with nowhere to go after the collapse of Communism.

    Reply
  34. Zalman

    All this climate change “science” reached by apparent consensus among “scientists” smells. There seems to be a “climate change” industry developing, with the aim of compelling everyone to accept facts not necessarily in evidence. If the temperature of the atmosphere has been changing so dramatically, how come it has managed to stay the same for at least a decade? How much longer does the climate change lobby need to establish a warming trend? And if the trend might indeed one day show a warming curve, and if that curve should somehow be proven to be attributable to human activity, why is this lobby so bitterly opposed to any engineered mitigation projects? The statement that “alternative” energy solutions are competitive with current means of energy production at this time is total fiction.

    Reply
  35. bigpicture

    It is true everyone seems to be promoting their own agendas for their own commercial or political reasons. And yes the climate is indicating a warming trend. But how much of this is due to human activity and how much is due to normal solar system cycles.

    There was an ice age where arctic ice extended all the way down to New York, and then it receded, and is still receding. Will this reverse in another thousand years and again New York will be under half a mile of ice? How many of these ebb and flow type ice ages have there been in the past?

    What about all the other planets in the Solar System, NASA data (since records have been kept) indicates that the other planets are all warming too, but there is no human activity on these planets. But they conveniently keep this non-agenda conforming information out of the news.

    Reply
  36. renewable guy

    John December 25, 2013 at 4:59 PM – Reply

    I’m already wide awake and I say global warming is bulls#it. Its a socialist scheme to transfer wealth. Nothing more.
    ##############

    Is that from Rush Limbaugh or Glenn Beck?

    Reply
  37. renewable guy

    Donald Berrian December 25, 2013 at 3:16 PM – Reply

    “There is one source of renewable energy source that beats the cost of fossil fuels in every region”. If that is true, we can drop all the green mandates and subsidies and let the free market deal with the problem. Thus far “green energy” is just a means of transferring the public’s hard earned money to well connected insiders with powerful lobbies.

    The public is not going to believe “green” claims until the lies become less obvious
    ######################
    We are already seeing evidence of increased symptoms of global warming. The cost of adaptation to global warming is predicted to reach 20% of GDP if we wait. If we start now and aggressively cut co2 to zero in the next 50 years, we are looking at 2% of world GDP

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avoiding_dangerous_climate_change
    “ARTICLE 2. OBJECTIVE. The ultimate objective of this Convention and any related legal instruments that the Conference of the Parties may adopt is to achieve, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Convention, stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system. Such a level should be achieved within a time-frame sufficient to allow ecosystems to adapt naturally to climate change, to ensure that food production is not threatened and to enable economic development to proceed in a sustainable manner.” (Emph. added)[3]

    Reply
  38. John

    I’m already wide awake and I say global warming is bulls#it. Its a socialist scheme to transfer wealth. Nothing more.

    Reply
  39. Verify

    Once must wonder why the IMF exists, who funds it, why are they pushing Global Warming, and what profits do they and their greedy minions make on carbon cap & trade? All they need is the political clout to achieve their goal via ignorant idiots called – environMentalists, that never took a science course. It is good to see not all have succumbed to the propaganda – there is hope for humanity.

    Reply
  40. Chimel

    Where are the links to the OECD, IMF, IPCC and ARENA reports or any source mentioned in the article??? Is everything in the article fake, or is it really based on actual information from these reports? I don’t see the article any different from the climate change denialists if there is not a single link to support its claims. This is really bad writing.

    Reply
  41. Matthew James

    Tired of all the climate change propaganda. The earth is actually headed for a vast cooling period. The Earth is not warming. I realize there’s a lot if money to be made by shoving this lie down everyone’s throat. And how come this media never covers the scientist who dispute such lies?

    Reply
  42. renewable guy

    bh2 December 25, 2013 at 2:45 PM – Reply

    The left are panicked, having backed away from so many wild and baseless claims of “proof” that that the “world community” has been reduced to a loyal but shrinking cadre of true believers.
    ##############

    I am panicked, but not for the reason you say. It is very clear we are warming from human co2 emissions.

    http://www.skepticalscience.com/empirical-evidence-for-global-warming.htm

    Beginning level

    Less energy is escaping to space: Carbon dioxide (CO2) acts like a blanket; adding more CO2 makes the ‘blanket’ thicker, and humans are adding more CO2 all the time.

    intermediate level

    Direct observations find that CO2 is rising sharply due to human activity. Satellite and surface measurements find less energy is escaping to space at CO2 absorption wavelengths. Ocean and surface temperature measurements find the planet continues to accumulate heat. This gives a line of empirical evidence that human CO2 emissions are causing global warming.

    Reply
  43. renewable guy

    Markavelli December 25, 2013 at 2:26 PM – Reply

    More like moving from awareness to fiction.
    ############
    Science is as reality based as anyone can get. Their statements are all backed up with data. Reality is just tough to accept sometimes.

    Reply
  44. john

    In general, why does the right fear looking at humanity as merely a part of the global systems?

    Answer:
    The philosophy of the right is predicated on the unshakable belief that the stuff of nature is created for human use. Humans sit above all others and are the purpose of creation itself. The right believes in independent creature (humans) and that all responsibility for action is likewise individual.

    Discussion
    Human are part of the larger system of relations and have co-evolved in systems of nested sets involving both living and non-living forces. The notion of individualism bears little scrutiny since most of a human body’s genetic material is non-human.

    Why does the right fear accepting science in general and why in particular does the right reject a human cause of climate change?

    Answer:
    The philosophy of the right is governed by ideological beliefs (e.g. that the bible is literally true), and the job for individuals is to live up to a code that is preordained. Along with religious notions are eonomic truisms (e.g. big government is bad, private economic activity is good, freedom is primarily an individual concern and is primarily a measure of private economic possibilities, individual freedoms and needs outweigh collective freedoms and needs). Contrariwise, the scientific model would have us study the forces and activities around us derive conclusions based upon evidence and act accordingly. (e.g. the earth is about 5 billion years old and life on the planet around 4, co-evolution is an obvious engine for living change, humans have significantly increased the rate of climate change over the past hundred years or so, .)

    Discussion
    In general the right movies from belief and feelings to actions they reproduce the identity of the actor. The left tends to feel that identity is communal and shared and that facts govern the direction of what would be best for the collective.

    Reply
  45. Donald Berrian

    “There is one source of renewable energy source that beats the cost of fossil fuels in every region”. If that is true, we can drop all the green mandates and subsidies and let the free market deal with the problem. Thus far “green energy” is just a means of transferring the public’s hard earned money to well connected insiders with powerful lobbies.

    The public is not going to believe “green” claims until the lies become less obvious.

    Reply
  46. bh2

    The left are panicked, having backed away from so many wild and baseless claims of “proof” that that the “world community” has been reduced to a loyal but shrinking cadre of true believers.

    Reply
  47. Tony

    Oh By the way?? Trees love carbon you idiot, its what they breath and they give us oxygen !

    Reply
  48. Tony

    Global warming ?? really? , more like Global cooling you nut jobs !

    Reply
  49. The Happy Infidel

    Fact: there hasn’t been any warming in over 17 years.

    I’m staring at the problem of Global Warming in the right earnest.

    Are you?

    Reply
  50. BOB NORGARD

    Right and I guess you’re spending the $ 2500.00 Obama saved you on insurance on Christmas presents this year.
    Delusional Liberals rejoice.

    Reply
  51. stephen king

    Why don’t, the groverment make solar systems
    More affordable, Especially for people with a south
    Facing roof’s.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.