Scientists discovered that BPS, a substance that replaces BPA in plastic bottles, is equally harmful to humans. Manufacturers of plastic bottle claim that they heed to health alerts and have replaced BPA with a new substance. Doctors highly recommend using BPA-free bottles for infants. However, the substance they use as a substitute, BPS, has been discovered to be equally unsuitable for the purpose of human consumption.

BPA or Bisphenol-A has been associated almost all forms of illnesses in human beings, ranging from obesity to some forms of cancers. To ensure minimum consumption of the chemical in human bodies, it is recommended that people use BPA free bottles. This could help cut down some quantity that may be consumed through liquids or food contained in BPA-containing plastic bottles. The usual substitute for BPA is BPS.

The use of BPA in plastic bottles is not completely disapproved of by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. But many manufacturers sought to make their bottles healthier by abandoning BPA and adopting BPS. However, recent research has established that both the substances are responsible for causing similar harms in humans. There is no known substitute for BPS yet, leading manufacturers with the compulsion of deploying either of the two substances in manufacturing plastic bottles.

A lack of alternative suggestions for the substance arises because neither of the two substances has been subjected to much research. As a result, their effects are not clearly known.

The recent claims that BPS and BPA cause equal potential damages were made after the researchers at the University of Calgary published their new study. In their research, the scientists found traces of BPA in as much as 90% of urine samples. The scientists concluded that a remedy to the problem is the removal of all variations of bisphenols from everyday products.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

I accept the Privacy Policy

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.